Smart Arse Corner

Narcissism; the dark side of archaeological buffoonery

Last Saturday’s Daily Telegraph (14 July)  carried an interesting piece about trainee priests facing tests to weed out narcissists. It quoted former Church of England (CoE) priest, Mark Vernon – now working as a psycho-therapist – that narcissists are drawn to positions of power to “lord it over others.” Church bosses are aware of spiritual abuse, the Daily Telegraph reports, especially where a cleric uses religious authority to coerce or exploit. “A portion of people in leadership positions, with narcissistic traits,” Vernon says, ”will very malignly take it out on others.”

Much of this will doubtless be familiar to many detectorists. Sadly, they’ve been subjected to vile narcissistic abuse and name calling from ‘pseudo-intellectuals’ posing as bona fide archaeologists; these fruitcakes refer to detectorists as in-breds and slack-jaws (the results of incestuous relationships). Like death and taxes, these narcissists are inescapable and are the Cross detectorists have to bear.

But it’s not just detectorists who come in for this organised abuse. The UK’s world-leading Portable Antiquities Scheme and its dedicated staff are also targeted – almost daily – by these loutish, serial abusers, while tellingly, archaeology ‘does a Nelson’ to the malevolence.

So what is narcissism? Psychology Today describes the condition: –

“The hallmarks of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) are grandiosity, a lack of empathy for other people, and a need for admiration. People with this condition are frequently described as arrogant, self-centered, manipulative, and demanding. They may also concentrate on grandiose fantasies (e.g. their own success, beauty, brilliance) and may be convinced that they deserve special treatment. These characteristics typically begin in early adulthood and must be consistently evident in multiple contexts, such as at work and in relationships.”

People with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special, and often try to associate with other people they believe are unique or gifted in some way. This association enhances their self-esteem, which is typically quite fragile underneath the surface. Individuals with NPD seek excessive admiration and attention in order to know that others think highly of them. Individuals with narcissistic personality disorder have difficulty tolerating criticism or defeat, and may be left feeling humiliated or empty when they experience an “injury” in the form of criticism or rejection.”

‘Spotting the Narcy’ is the new game in town.  Happy hunting.

………………………………………………………………..

Buddhists say…”No matter how much you wash a turd, it will not come clean.”

Bearing this in mind I had to chuckle when I read one of Paul Barford’s recent pronouncements on his pisspoor blog. It seems that an FLO in the north of England mis-identified a Byzantine coin [big deal, eh?].  Of course Barford was on  it straight away like a hyena pouncing on a zebra carcass. He ended his comment  with…”Heritage professionals misleading the public.”

Huh? What you may wonder, qualifies Barford – who likes to be known as an archaeologist – to make such a comment when his continuing support for HERITAGE ACTION’S  thoroughly discredited  Artefact Erosion Counter shows he’s not at all au fait with Buddhist wisdom.

………………………………………………………………………………….

 

 

“You are going on a long journey…I see a tall dark stranger…”

Heritage Journal – the ludicrous heritage blog on the outer limits of credibility  – recently sported this little gem:-

“Oh well, PAS has dismissed us and detectorists have insulted us for 20 years.[sic] for voicing a simple truth…” (naturally, simple truth, in HJ’s bigoted lexicon, means ‘our truth’ as opposed to actual truth). But just when we all thought the heritage buffoons couldn’t descend any further into the pit of out-and-out idiocy, they’ve not failed to disappoint.

Preposterously, despite HJ’s ongoing fact-free campaign that detectorists are guilty of knowledge theft and worse,  regardless of the colossal detector-related input to the UK Government’s Portable Antiquities Scheme database,  HJ’s own fabrication posing as ‘fact’ manifested  in the Artefact Erosion Counter may well have been based on a little-known, hush-hush archaeological technique. But now, HJ’s semi-covert scribbler, Alan S has let the archaeological cat out of the bag.

It is now believed the  ‘accuracy’ of HJ’s fib-filled, ersatz AEC  was based on the newly unveiled procedure, which involves data centred and distilled from the turn of a Tarot Card; the method HJ currently employs to ‘predict’ the future of the UK’s archaeological sites.  Every Tuesday, the day they scientifically term ‘Tarot Tuesday’, is when a Tarot Card is drawn from the pack and  ‘read’ to determine a chosen heritage site’s future.

For twenty years, HJ whines, detectorists  have ‘insulted’ them. Hardly surprising is it when they set themselves up as skittles with this latest archaeological technique, arguably the  crassest act of heritage stupidity ever witnessed.

………………………………………………………………………….

The BM hasn’t lost its Marbles…

Judging from the  scribblings of some in fringe heritology causes me to wonder whether they have any concept of compassion.

In a recent court case it was  alleged that: –

The girlfriend of an ISIS thug planned a revenge attack in Britain because her boyfriend was killed in Syria. The court was told that she allegedly planned to stroll into the British Museum and pull the pin on a hand-grenade amidst many visitors.

Had she carried out her alleged revenge attack, the death toll would have been considerable as would have been the number of seriously wounded.

The safety of its visitors is undoubtedly a paramount consideration and one taken seriously by the BM, but not by everyone it seems. Commenting on an  increasingly shallow, risible, and verbose blog, one undistinguished heritologist’s  overriding fear is apparently elsewhere as his clumsy syntax tellingly infers: –

 “How safe are antiquities (like the Parthenon Marbles) safe  in London.”

………………………………………………………………………….

Flat out? Jeez…He’s done it again!

 “Why are not more PhDs written investigating the claims made about PAS actually based in reality?” Barford asks. The obvious answer being that those written PhDs investigating  the claims made about PAS were based in reality, proving there’s no PAS case to answer, unlike some of Barfly’s wild assumptions and exaggerations which will make a glorious subject for any aspiring  investigative writer.

Were Barfly really interested in factual reality, he’d fess-up about the fiction he and others concocted resulting in the now totally discredited Artefact Erosion Counter; the propaganda exercise that  mainstream archaeology (read here, the CBA) fell over itself to support who stupidly though it was a fine, academically-sound  anti-metal detecting propagandist piece.  Hard Cheddar arkies; you got that one wrong! You’ve only yourselves to blame and I’m not about to dig you out of the shit. He, he, he.

Nevertheless, Barfly thankfully, still clings to the AEC’s  inventions, distortions, and bullshit, much the same  as Flat Earthers cling to the notion that satellite photos of a spherical Earth are NASA and government agency conspiracies.

…………………………………………………

Oscar #3…

… goes to ‘Alan S.’ a worthy winner who’s the semi-covert contributor to the pisspoor Heritage Journal blog. A committed objector to the proposed and urgently needed Stonehenge Tunnel Project, our Al now takes issue with the eminently sensible exploratory survey trenches dug nearby to the monument by claiming: –

“Depressingly, the methods used in these cases have not been to the same standards to which academic research is carried out.” Blimey, he’s obviously an expert.

Nevertheless, he’s seemingly oblivious that Heritage Journal not best known for the ‘same standards to which academic research is carried out’ is itself, somewhat less than the paragon of archaeological virtue it would have the world believe. While he’s enthusiastic, fanatical even in his criticism of archaeologists on the Stonehenge Project, the Heritage Journal’s widely-derided, propagandist bunkum, masquerading as some kind of ‘academic research’, the so-called Artefact Erosion Counter, has ‘em rolling in the aisles. It’s archaeology’s vaudeville act.

Hahahahahahahahahah!

…………………………………………………………………………………

The aroma of snobbery?

The Heritage Journal’s ‘Alan S.’ who unsurprisingly prefers anonymity rather than using his full name and for good reason I suspect, enthuses about the upcoming course, ‘How to do Archaeology’ ending his laudation with this patronising blarney : –

“The course costs £49, is endorsed by the Chartered Institute for Archaeologists(CIfA) and starts on Tuesday May 1st, so get in quick and register now.

Dare we say, for the cost of a couple of decent hammies, many metal detectorists would do well to follow this course, and learn how to do things correctly, for the good of all!”

When it comes to learning and doing things properly, ‘Alan S.’ would be well advised to look inwards at the Heritage Journal and its widely discredited, fact-free bunkum known as the Artefact Erosion Counter. Whoever dreamed up this AEC claptrap and tried to palm it off as being somehow academic ought to be the first in the queue clutching 49-quid in his sweaty little mitt.

Dare I say, for the cost of a couple of decent roman pots, the AEC’s authors would do well to follow this course, and learn how to do things correctly, for the good of all!

If that fails, maybe ‘Alan S.’ could ask the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) to show the Heritage Journal how to do things? Currently, the PAS has over 1.3m detector-found artefacts on its database, and 638 academic research projects undertaken based on those finds… now, that is for the good of all.

…………………………………………………………………………

Ho, ho!

So much for archaeological accuracy.

https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/bronze-age-archaeologist-james-mellart-fakes/

………………………………………………………………………..

Barford gets Oscar #2!

Determined to hog the Smart Arse limelight, our old friend Paul Barford, the Warsaw-based heritologist is up to his old tricks again with this entry of bovine scatology on his pisspoor blog: –

“Some British detectorist super brains have been debating how many rallies or club digs you can have on a field before it becomes not worth detecting. What they mean is how long before the archaeological record has been destroyed. The answer seems to vary between a few times and many but they all understand it will happen sooner or later and not one of them ever, ever expresses remorse. That’s why we think they and their hobby are a disgrace.

No surprises for what he thinks about Tekkies then.

At least, and to the best of my knowledge, no Tekkie has ever betrayed a People, or, worked for, or taken money from, an authoritarian political system that  oppressed freedom and democracy.

…………………………………

Przychodzą tutaj, zabierając naszą pracę i kobiety* 

The Smart-Arse Oscar this time goes to our old friend, Paul Barford, humbly describing himself as a “British archaeologist living and working in Warsaw, Poland Since the early 1990s (or even longer),” [well, he does have a lot to be humble about] recently demonstrated another sample of his dazzling wit. Writing on his (pisspoor) blog on the 24 February, under the headline, Immigrants Pocketing European Archaeological Record, our jolly joker drolly observed that: –

“Brexiters do not like the idea of ‘furriners coming to our country and taking advantage of the social benefits and all that’. Immigrants like expatriate ‘Robert’ need to think about this when deciding to go out and pilfer the French archaeologcal [sic] record for collectables to pocket: […].”

Witty, eh? But you might ponder what the indigenous Poles made of things back in 1986 when a ‘furriner’ arrived from the Free West to take advantage of “the social benefits and all that” of the kind lavished by the Ruling Comrades on Party members, defectors, sympathizers, and toadies, whilst ordinary Poles went short.

Tut, tut. Must try harder tovarishch.

*They come here, taking our jobs and women

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.